[Pce] Second WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type

Dear PCE WG, Considering the concerns discussed on the list after the 1st WG Last Call, especially about the backward compatibility of the additional TLV (please see Jon's change list), this message starts a 2nd LC on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06. It will end on Monday December 4. Thanks for

Re: [Pce] Second WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type

As co-author - yes/support Regards, Jeff > On Nov 21, 2017, at 00:32, Julien Meuric wrote: > > Dear PCE WG, > > Considering the concerns discussed on the list after the 1st WG Last > Call, especially about the backward compatibility of the additional TLV > (please

[Pce] PCE WG Minutes for IETF100

Hi WG, The minutes are uploaded at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ doc/minutes-100-pce/ Please let me know if there are any comments. Thanks! Dhruv ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

I'm OK with downgrading the "must" to a "may" (in lowercase). Cheers Jon From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 19 November 2017 14:43 To: 'Julien Meuric' ; 'Dhruv Dhody' ; Jonathan Hardwick

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extension for WSON Routing and Wavelength Assignment Authors : Young Lee

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages Authors : Siva Sivabalan Jeff

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06.txt

Dear PCE WG This new revision of the LSP setup type draft makes the following changes. 1) Added a capability TLV for the OPEN object and rules for processing it, as discussed in the attached thread. This is to address Julien's WGLC comment that there was no way for a PCEP speaker to express

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11.txt

This new revision brings draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing in-line with the new LSP-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY TLV just published in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 20 November 2017 15:01

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06.txt

Hi Jon, Thanks for the update. One comment regarding this paragraph: "If the peer has sent no PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY TLV, then the PCEP speaker MUST infer that the peer supports path setup using at least RSVP-TE. The PCEP speaker MAY also infer that the peer supports other path