Re: [Pce] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with DISCUSS)

2018-05-04 Thread Warren Kumari
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:25 AM Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > Hi Warren, Ignas, > > Sorry for the slow reply. I think Deborah already explained our intent on > the telechat. ​Yup -- somehow I'd *completely* missed the intent / text explaining that. Deborah pointe

Re: [Pce] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with DISCUSS)

2018-05-04 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Warren, Ignas, Sorry for the slow reply. I think Deborah already explained our intent on the telechat. As this document does not actually define any new path setup types (just a mechanism to allow multiple path setup types) we can really only make generalized statements about the sorts of

[Pce] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with DISCUSS)

2018-04-04 Thread Warren Kumari
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to ht