tained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
>> total or partial
>> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
>> intended
>> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
>> notify the sender by
>> p
c: LITKOWSKI Stephane DTF/DERX <stephane.litkow...@orange.com>;
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com>;
pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC of
draft-ie
s.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04.txt=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-05.txt
>
> Txt:
> https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-grou
Txt: https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-
> ietf-pce-association-group-05.txt
>
>
>
> *From:* Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Cyril Margaria
> *Sent:* 02 February 2018 04:54
> *To:* LITKOWSKI Stephane DTF/DERX <stephane.litkow...@oran
Very bad of me to be so late responding. I have put aside all minor wrinkles
because of that.
But...
> > 5.1
> >
> >R (Removal - 1 bit): when set, the requesting PCE peer requires the
> > removal of an LSP from the association group. This flag is used
> > for ASSOCIATION object
pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
>
> This is an important piece of work and there are a number of drafts
> dependent on it that will provide useful function. So we should definitely
> push forward to publication, but we also have to get this fo
g/pce/QSobS2pul-lIlMLXV4KcBhwgBM0
>
> Adrian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> > Sent: 19 February 2018 10:48
> > To: pce@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
&
gt; Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
>
> Hi,
>
> This WG LC has ended. Authors, some comments have been raised (at least
> by Cyril): please address them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon & Julien
>
>
> Feb. 01, 2018 - Julien Meuric:
>
Hi,
This WG LC has ended. Authors, some comments have been raised (at least
by Cyril): please address them.
Thanks,
Jon & Julien
Feb. 01, 2018 - Julien Meuric:
> Hi all,
>
> This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share your
>
ct: Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
Dear all,
I support this becoming a working group document.
Regards,
Mustapha.
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:10 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [P
Dear all,
I support this becoming a working group document.
Regards,
Mustapha.
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 9:10 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
Hi all,
Hi Julien, WG,
Yes/support. Very important base document for many other documents for LSP
association (such as draft-barth-pce-association-bidir).
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2018-02-01, 9:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
This is an important piece of work and there are a number of drafts
dependent on it that will provide useful function. So we should
definitely push forward to publication, but we also have to get this
foundational document right otherwise we will struggle later.
I have some moderate-sized issues
Support as co-author.
- Hari
On 01/02/2018, 06:10, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share your
Support.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
发送时间: 2018年2月1日 22:10
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
Hi all,
This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share
Hi,
I support the feature, I have the following comment regarding the draft:
- There is not mandated capability negotiation, this generally makes
interworking more cumbersome.
This could be resolved by mandating the presence of OP-CONF-ASSOC-RANGE,
and using reserved value 0,0 for
Support
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 15:10
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group
Hi all,
This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 2/1/18, 09:10, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share your
18 matches
Mail list logo