[pcre-dev] [Bug 1202] Issue with PRIV symbols in pcre_printint.c

2012-01-23 Thread Philip Hazel
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202 --- Comment #2 from Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2012-01-23 10:15:13 --- I am not sure that the patch is enough. What we have is references in printint.c

Re: [pcre-dev] several messages

2012-01-23 Thread Philip Hazel
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, ND wrote: No. If PCRE can not calculate the length of the longest lookbehind in pattern then main application must know that string returned for a partial match may be not long enough and may be more symbols needed to keep. If PCRE can calculate the length of the

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1202] Issue with PRIV symbols in pcre_printint.c

2012-01-23 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202 --- Comment #3 from Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu 2012-01-23 10:35:34 --- (In reply to comment #2) I am not sure that the patch is enough. What we have

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1202] Issue with PRIV symbols in pcre_printint.c

2012-01-23 Thread Philip Hazel
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202 --- Comment #4 from Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2012-01-23 12:07:40 --- On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Zoltan Herczeg wrote: The definitions are in

Re: [pcre-dev] [Bug 1202] Issue with PRIV symbols in pcre_printint.c

2012-01-23 Thread Graycode
The patch worked fine for me. No extra reference to pcre_tables was needed for linking pcretest when the base library was built as a Windows DLL. Regards, Graycode -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1202] Issue with PRIV symbols in pcre_printint.c

2012-01-23 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202 Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [pcre-dev] several messages

2012-01-23 Thread ND
May be it can be useful to combine our approaches to reduce the number of cases when zero-length partial match may occur? So, zero-length partial match is allowed when: 1. it arises within a lookahead AND 2. pattern have lookbehind with non-zero length -- ## List details at

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1049] Add support for UTF-16

2012-01-23 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 --- Comment #65 from Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu 2012-01-23 20:44:08 --- Can we close this bug now? -- Configure bugmail:

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1049] Add support for UTF-16

2012-01-23 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 --- Comment #66 from Giuseppe D'Angelo dange...@gmail.com 2012-01-23 21:02:12 --- I guess so. :) Thank you very much for your efforts! Cheers, Giuseppe