Hi Arpe,
thanks for your suggestion! Just my two cents: the reason of the search is that
it shouldn't be a bottleneck. I suspect it takes less than 1% of the total
compilation time, although I never really measured it. I think before we jump
to coding, we should measure it somehow.
I wouldn't
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Alternatively, we can simply use something like:
static char* error_texts[] = { text1, text2, ... };
error_texts[i] would return with the text corresponding to error code.
Isn't that what we are trying to avoid? I suspect that is what it used
to be
