--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340
--- Comment #2 from Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2013-02-27 10:16:45
---
So do I. I will apply it as soon as I've finished the item I'm currently
working
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1336
--- Comment #10 from Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2013-02-27 15:42:48
---
I have implemented \p{Xuc} (and \P of course) in the interpreter and committed
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340
Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1336
Paulo Torrens paulo_torr...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 2013-02-22 11:41, ph10 wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, I wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, ND wrote:
Ah, yes, that would automatically do what I have just suggested. Noted.
I have committed a patch that adds this feature.
Thanks a lot, Philip.
Best regards
--
## List details at
On 2013-02-22 11:15, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Hi,
JIT support is added.
Regards,
Zoltan
ph10@??? írta:
I have committed a patch that puts the bumpalong offset into the third
element of the offsets vector when the interpreter is used. This applies
to both hard and soft partial matching. pcretest
Hi,
Zoltan, have you time and possibilities to make support of backtracking verbs
in JIT?
It's will be another great deal!
I don't have much free time nowadays. Which one is the most important for you?
I was thinking about them and they are difficult (not surprisingly they are the
last
