Hi,
If you don’t mind I will just leave all 8 builds activated, personally I would
consider sparc64-jit the most relevant build besides amd64-jit for Solaris so
make it a +1 from me to encourage you to add the remaining part :-)
I will try to add it, but likely not in the near future.
On 13.01.2014 18:52, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/Testing/PCRE2_proposal.pdf
Changes look good to me, just one though on this quote from above:
Question: There have been requests for the pattern to be given as a
pointer and length,
On 15 January 2014 13:28, Ralf Junker ralfjun...@gmx.de wrote:
Also, specifying the length, would potentially allow 0x00 values in
patterns. Not sure if you want to allow those, probably not.
I would welcome this change, as it brings PCRE closer to Perl. (This
is also what makes PCRE's and
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
--- Comment #9 from Tony Reix tony.r...@bull.net 2014-01-15 13:42:07 ---
= 0x1007f5e0 +180: ld r9,32720(r9)
0x1007f5e4 +184: addi
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
--- Comment #10 from Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu 2014-01-15 14:45:28
---
This is clearly not a valid ppc code. Could you dump some instructions when you
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
--- Comment #11 from Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu 2014-01-15 14:59:25
---
And one more thing. Please run pcre_jit_test, it prints the name of the current
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
--- Comment #12 from Tony Reix tony.r...@bull.net 2014-01-15 15:44:10 ---
(gdb) si
0x1007f5f4 7260return
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
--- Comment #14 from Zoltan Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu 2014-01-15 20:35:01
---
This is getting more and more confusing. The wrong endianness detection is ok,
