At 18:30 25/01/2015, you wrote:
´¯¯¯
I think the issue is that the byte code of the pattern is too big.
It is basically (?:\d+=) times. It was easier to implement the
interpreter this way (JIT converts back the byte code into an
interator again, because of the code
Hi,
the pattern is always compiled to byte code first, and JIT converts it back, so
using JIT alone does not help. The reason of not using an iterator in the
interpreter is practical: PCRE interpreter uses stack recursion, and you cannot
easily share variable data across function calls. This
