[pcre-dev] [Bug 1679] Ability to explicitly specify what to capture (feature request)

2015-08-29 Thread admin
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679 --- Comment #8 from henrik.h...@aol.de --- > I have added interpretation of ${*MARK} to pcre2_substitute() and committed > the patch. It seems to work OK. It's great that it could be implemented so fast. Now I have to wait for months or years till it's

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1679] Ability to explicitly specify what to capture (feature request)

2015-08-29 Thread admin
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679 --- Comment #6 from Philip Hazel --- Allowing an escape in a *MARK name would be incompatible with Perl, but it could be done using a non-default PCRE2 option. That is a separate issue to allowing for ${*mark} in substitutions, of course. (And probably m

Re: [pcre-dev] Overran compiling workspace

2015-08-29 Thread ND
On 2015-08-29 15:28, ph10 wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, ND wrote: Internal link size = 3 That was the difference. This turned out to be a bug in the test for the error situation. I have committed the patch. It works. Thank you. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: [pcre-dev] Overran compiling workspace

2015-08-29 Thread ph10
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, ND wrote: > Internal link size = 3 That was the difference. This turned out to be a bug in the test for the error situation. I have committed the patch. Here it is: --- pcre_compile.c (revision 1595) +++ pcre_compile.c (working copy) @@ -4639,8 +4639,7 @@ /* I