On 2019-06-25 09:30, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
> It seems JIT is 16 times!! slower than interpreter for such simple
pattern.
I did some improvements on the SSE2 accelerated search and /(?s).*/
search. You can try them now. However I have never seen such big
differences in my measurements. The
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019, I wrote:
> I woke up in the middle of last night with an idea as to how it could
> easily be made better, but I haven't looked at the code yet. I am busy
> with other things today and tomorrow, but then I will see if my midnight
> bright idea actually works.
I have
Hi,
> It seems JIT is 16 times!! slower than interpreter for such simple pattern.
I did some improvements on the SSE2 accelerated search and /(?s).*/ search. You
can try them now. However I have never seen such big differences in my
measurements. The memchr can use AVX2, so it is still faster,
