On 2019-07-01 10:28, ph10 wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote:
PCRE2 version 10.33 2019-04-16
> /\A(?:.|..)(*THEN)c/
> abc
> No match
>>> Perl is match "abc".
> I suppose "next innermost alternative" is interpreted differently by
PCRE and
> Perl.
>> If so, may be PCRE should
On 2019-07-01 10:28, ph10 wrote:
I think this is a bug in Perl and I will report it as such.
It's great.
As you participate in Perl regex development can you take a look at
another Perl bug please:
PCRE2 version 10.33 2019-04-16
/\A(?:.(*COMMIT))*c/
abcd
No match
But Perl reports
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote:
> PCRE2 version 10.33 2019-04-16
> /\A(?:.|..)(*THEN)c/
> abc
> No match
>
>
> Perl is match "abc".
> I suppose "next innermost alternative" is interpreted differently by PCRE and
> Perl.
>
> If so, may be PCRE should go Perl way in this matter?
I
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2412
--- Comment #1 from Philip Hazel ---
This would have to be a new function called, say, pcre2_get_match_data_size(),
with a match_data block as an argument. It should be straightforward, and I
have noted the requirement. In the meantime, you can get
