Thank you for the help. The fix is landed in r1551.
Regards,
Zoltan
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com írta:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
I think the following instruction is the problem:
0x03ffb7cc0010: stp x29, x30, [sp,#-56]!
sp must be 16 byte
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:39:01PM +0200, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Thank you for tracking this down. Revision 1506 is a big commit, and a quite
a few lines were changed in AARCH64. Perhaps I created an invalid instruction
form.
Could you capture the crash, execute
disassemble $pc-64,$pc+64
I think the following instruction is the problem:
0x03ffb7cc0010: stp x29, x30, [sp,#-56]!
sp must be 16 byte aligned all the time.
Petr, I will send you a patch. Let me know if it fixes the problem.
Regards,
Zoltan
--
## List details at
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
I think the following instruction is the problem:
0x03ffb7cc0010: stp x29, x30, [sp,#-56]!
sp must be 16 byte aligned all the time.
Petr, I will send you a patch. Let me know if it fixes the problem.
Excelent.
Thank you for tracking this down. Revision 1506 is a big commit, and a quite a
few lines were changed in AARCH64. Perhaps I created an invalid instruction
form.
Could you capture the crash, execute
disassemble $pc-64,$pc+64
x/128xw $pc-64
in gdb and send me the output? Seeing the actual
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:39:13PM +0100, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
The AArch64 is worse. It compiles with JIT but crashes on tests:
FAIL: RunTest
=
PCRE2 C library tests using test data from ./testdata
PCRE2 version 10.10-RC1 2015-02-20
Testing 8-bit library
Test 0:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:39:13PM +0100, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
The AArch64 is worse. It compiles with JIT but crashes on tests:
FAIL: RunTest
=
PCRE2 C library tests using test data from ./testdata
PCRE2 version 10.10-RC1 2015-02-20
Testing 8-bit library
Test 0:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 26 February 2015 at 12:39, Zoltán Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu wrote:
The message bus error is also interesting, not the usual segmentation
fault. I don't know this error, but according to wikipedia, a bus error is
a fault raised by
I don't think these are related. The problem is in test2, not in test19 (the
serialization test). Sparc64 JIT has not implemented yet. ARM 64 supports
unaligned access, so a possible alignment issue is unusual. Perhaps the program
counter is executing something from a wrong address.
Petr,
Hi Petr,
thank you for running PCRE2 on many environments.
The AArch64 is worse. It compiles with JIT but crashes on tests:
FAIL: RunTest
=
PCRE2 C library tests using test data from ./testdata
PCRE2 version 10.10-RC1 2015-02-20
Testing 8-bit library
Test 0: Unchecked
On 26 February 2015 at 12:39, Zoltán Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu wrote:
The message bus error is also interesting, not the usual segmentation
fault. I don't know this error, but according to wikipedia, a bus error is a
fault raised by hardware when a process is trying to access memory that
On 24 February 2015 at 16:10, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I've changed my mind, mainly because I can't find a way of getting gcc
to disable that warning while still turning on -Wformat to do format
checking.
Pass -std=c99 to it?
$ gcc -x c -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Werror
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 16:10, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I've changed my mind, mainly because I can't find a way of getting gcc
to disable that warning while still turning on -Wformat to do format
checking.
Pass -std=c99 to it?
I tried
Hi,
src/sljit/sljitNativeARM_32.c:340:28: error: 'compiler' undeclared (first use
in this function)
SLJIT_FREE(curr_patch, compiler-allocator_data);
^
src/pcre2_jit_compile.c:60:61: note: in definition of macro 'SLJIT_FREE'
#define SLJIT_FREE(ptr,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Petr Pisar wrote:
Indeed, it was caused by the hard limit beeing smaller than soft limit which
pcre2test tried to test. Attached patch improved the error message:
Thanks for running all the tests that your do, and thanks for this
patch. I have, in fact, implemented a
I have put a release candidate for PCRE2 release 10.10 on the FTP site:
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/Testing/pcre2-10.10-RC1.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/Testing/pcre2-10.10-RC1.tar.bz2
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I have put a release candidate for PCRE2 release 10.10 on the FTP site:
I'm giving a try to this release for the first time of PCRE2, and I experience
a test failure on 32-bit PowerPC:
FAIL: RunTest
=
PCRE2 C
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I have put a release candidate for PCRE2 release 10.10 on the FTP site:
I'm giving a try to this release for the first time of PCRE2, and I experience
a test
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +, p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I have put a release candidate for PCRE2 release 10.10 on the FTP site:
* No compiler warnings, all tests pass on GNU/Linux with these configurations:
s390, disabled JIT
x86_64, enabled JIT
s390x, disabled JIT
* All tests
19 matches
Mail list logo
