On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
1248556 pcre-8.30.tar.bz2
15520 Nov 24 2010 pcredemo.c
What? The code is there for me. Line 187 onwards.
It is certainly also in my copy of the tarball.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel--
## List details at
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, jonetsu wrote:
pcredemo segfaults when using the -g param, as in the following (cmd
on a single line) :
Thanks for the report. I will see if I can reproduce it on my 32-bit
system. I have to admit that pcredemo.c hasn't been touched since
November 2010, so it is quite
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, jonetsu wrote:
/* Loop for second and subsequent matches */
for (;;)
{
[ snip ]
// Added bit:
(void)pcre_fullinfo(
re,
NULL,
PCRE_INFO_NAMETABLE,
name_table);
// Back to original code:
if (namecount = 0) printf(No named
Le Vendredi, 24 Février 2012 17:24:40 + (GMT),
Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk a écrit :
Which version of PCRE are you using?
1248556 pcre-8.30.tar.bz2
15520 Nov 24 2010 pcredemo.c
From:
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/
(as per the web page)
I've also
On 25 February 2012 01:30, jonetsu jone...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Le Vendredi, 24 Février 2012 17:24:40 + (GMT),
Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk a écrit :
Which version of PCRE are you using?
1248556 pcre-8.30.tar.bz2
15520 Nov 24 2010 pcredemo.c
What? The code is there for me. Line
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, jonetsu wrote:
But there's more than the rate to extract and this is where I haven't
found how to duplicate the behaviour of continuing a search, when using
pcredemo.
pcredemo -g
1) How can the /g option be added to pcredemo ?
pcredemo -g
2) In the case of the
Le Mardi, 23 Février 2012 17:15:27 + (GMT),
Philip Hazel p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk a écrit :
pcredemo -g
pcredemo segfaults when using the -g param, as in the following (cmd
on a single line) :
./pcredemo -g rate (?'rate'\d+)Kbit|ceil (?'ceil'\d+)Kbit
quantum 12500 rate 30Kbit ceil
