On 2019-07-22 16:32, ph10 wrote:
The characteristic of these is that the pattern can match an empty
string. I have now added this condition (which was easily done with no
repeated test) and those patterns now give partial matches.
It's excellent!!
Now it can be useful to try putting into
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote:
> /(?![ab]).*/
> ab\=ph
> 0:
>
> /c*+/
> ab\=ph,offset=2
> 0:
The characteristic of these is that the pattern can match an empty
string. I have now added this condition (which was easily done with no
repeated test) and those patterns now give
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2415
Philip Hazel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote:
> New algorithm still have another parts of discussed oversight. For example it
> returns full match instead of partial in following cases:
>
> /(?![ab]).*/
> ab\=ph
> 0:
>
> /c*+/
> ab\=ph,offset=2
> 0:
The answer to that may lie in thinking about
