https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120
--- Comment #17 from Rob ---
I appreciate the conceptual difficulty of trying to reconcile two incompatible
paradigms.
>From my perspective, the only change i need is that it doesnt throw an error. i
rewrote your escape handler so
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120
--- Comment #18 from Philip Hazel ---
I have just committed a documented patch that implements additional options
within the compile context, the first of which is
PCRE2_EXTRA_ALLOW_SURROGATE_ESCAPES. This is available in UTF-8
I have had a similar problem in my port to z/OS.I am not near my computer but I
will try to share my solution tonightZA
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:20 PM, ad...@bugs.exim.org
wrote: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2106
--- Comment
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120
--- Comment #19 from Zoltan Herczeg ---
Yes, the standard is quite strictly defined:
https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-patterns
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
I have checked my solution and it is somewhat relevant for the question as
asked. As I've mentioned, I'd struggled with the same issue. In the z/OS
environment I am not required to provide both POSIX and PCRE at the same time.
Also, for technical reasons I have to supply short name (8
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2106
--- Comment #2 from Philip Hazel ---
Thanks for this additional information. In fact we are already in the process
of testing translation functions within PCRE2. There is a general API which can
handle a number of different