Clint, I think you should continue with the secunia posts, for those who
do not receive the secunia updates or RSS feed.
Perhaps though, you should only send them once and be confident that
they do appear for others if not for yourself immediately :) so as to
not create a bulk of identical pos
Hi Everyone
For what it is worth, I appreciate the effort that Clint puts in. I would
much rather be told of issues or problems regarding computer security
two or three times than not at all.
Regards
David
> 1. No one is forcing you to read them. Set an email filter
> for "Secunia" if you
1. No one is forcing you to read them. Set an email filter
for "Secunia" if you don't like them.
2. It's NOT MY FAULT that there is something wrong with the
archives.
3. Not EVERYONE has your "sources" of information or
"knowledge". Consider other members that do NOT have your
"other sou
I'm sure that Clint has the best of intentions, but I've never found any
useful information in any of these post that I don't get from other
sources. These posts have the added disadvantage of provoking Clint's
soliloquies and multiple posts, which are not as amusing as they used to
be, especia
Harold I'm not sure what you mean by "Support-O" postings.
You're not *reading* the posts?? I think we discussed this
before. If you read them they are self-explanatory. There are
even "About" links in the posts! The subject lines say it all:
"...[whatever] **Vulnerabilities**"
You
Question for Clint (or anyone else who can help me). Dear Clint, I know you
are a storehouse of computer information, and are very helpful to the group.
We all know that and appreciate it. But poor me does not understand what I
am supposed to be getting from your (for want of any name), your "Su
