I refactored the startup/vwait code to be close to the
pd-gui-rewrite/0.43 startup procedure, but I removed the timeout that I
think was at the root of the problems here. I'll put together a patch
once I test it a bit more.
.hc
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 08:39 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I think
Patches item #3048061, was opened at 2010-08-18 16:24
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3048061&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Patches item #3057177, was opened at 2010-08-31 23:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3057177&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 22:04 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
> wrote:
>
> That's a bug in the command line flag parsing, you should file
> a bug
> report. IMHO, the whole flag parser should be rewritten using
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> That's a bug in the command line flag parsing, you should file a bug
> report. IMHO, the whole flag parser should be rewritten using on of the
> standard opt/flag parsing libraries. getopt is in libc but is more
> limited, I am s
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 13:23 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 12:44 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 02:00 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > > I guess we were super slack, you should have nagged more :).
> >
> > Yo, I am not in a hurry ;-)
> >
I guess I was feeling "bourne" last night at 2am. ;) Do you want to
just throw it in where you want, or shall I submit a patch? I was
thinking pd/src/pd-gui since the stuff in pd/src installs into ../bin,
but I don't think it really matters either way.
.hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 23:09 -0700, Mi
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 12:44 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 02:00 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > I guess we were super slack, you should have nagged more :).
>
> Yo, I am not in a hurry ;-)
>
> > I just
> > added you as 'rdz', I hope that's correct. Welcome!
>
>
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 02:00 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I guess we were super slack, you should have nagged more :).
Yo, I am not in a hurry ;-)
> I just
> added you as 'rdz', I hope that's correct. Welcome!
Thanks. The username 'rdz' belongs to someone else. That is why I had to
t
