Re: [PD-dev] split out 'osc' and 'net' from 'mrpeach'?

2010-11-29 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/28/2010 10:17 PM, Martin Peach wrote: On 2010-11-28 15:57, Roman Haefeli wrote: That's another reason they should be in net instead of mrpeach: it seems that having my name on the folder inhibits others from improving the objects, so we

Re: [PD-dev] split out 'osc' and 'net' from 'mrpeach'?

2010-11-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:36 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/28/2010 10:17 PM, Martin Peach wrote: On 2010-11-28 15:57, Roman Haefeli wrote: That's another reason they should be in net instead of mrpeach: it seems that having my name on the

Re: [PD-dev] split out 'osc' and 'net' from 'mrpeach'?

2010-11-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-11-29 18:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It is OK IMHO to have iemnet use the names as the mrpeach objects as long as the stated goal is interface compatibility. But I think this packaging idea is just added complication without and real benefit. A library is a library in Debian

Re: [PD-dev] split out 'osc' and 'net' from 'mrpeach'?

2010-11-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:48 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-11-29 18:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It is OK IMHO to have iemnet use the names as the mrpeach objects as long as the stated goal is interface compatibility. But I think this packaging idea is just added complication