Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3531000 ] Proposal for an alternative file format

2012-06-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-03 22:30, s p wrote: That's a very good point, ... it's a good idea to specify GUI infos, for better interoperability, but it should be explicitly said that this is optional information gui information (e.g. spatial layout) is not

[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3531000 ] Proposal for an alternative file format

2012-06-04 Thread s p
the patch's behaviour depends on the layout Arr ... that's right !!! Still, it doesn't mean that the layout is mandatory. It just means that those infos should be extracted and saved somehow. This should be pretty simple ... for example, if I think of inlets in a abstraction, I guess pd infers

Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3531000 ] Proposal for an alternative file format

2012-06-04 Thread Rich E
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:52 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-03 22:30, s p wrote: That's a very good point, ... it's a good idea to specify GUI infos, for better interoperability, but it should be explicitly said

Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3531000 ] Proposal for an alternative file format

2012-06-04 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
From: Rich E reakina...@gmail.com To: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at Cc: pd-dev@iem.at Sent: Monday, June 4, 2012 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3531000 ] Proposal for an alternative file format On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:52