Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus?

2013-06-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-06-02 08:51, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Of course these are just the latencies in the settings-- I haven't done the actual measurements yet. it would be interesting to have actual measurements. everything else is wild speculation. fgmadsr

[PD-dev] issiconvert

2013-06-03 Thread Funs Seelen
Hello devs, Inspired by this thread ( http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2013-05/102885.html) I spent the weekend doing exercises in writing simple conversions from int to symbol and vice versa, trying to get more used to the pd api. I ended up with a library of 8 classes I called

Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus?

2013-06-03 Thread katja
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 2013-06-02 08:51, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Of course these are just the latencies in the settings-- I haven't done the actual measurements yet. it would be interesting to have actual measurements. everything else is

[PD-dev] Midi overflow, when receiving Song Position Pointer (os x)

2013-06-03 Thread Jan Baumgart
Hi there, I'm experiencing a severe bug, when sending a Song Position Pointer message (0x242 0 0) to pd. After sending just one SPP message to pd, the status window says: warning: MIDI timing FIFO overflowed. When looking at the output of [midiin] I see 242 0 0 0 repeated endlessly. The

Re: [PD-dev] Midi overflow, when receiving Song Position Pointer (os x)

2013-06-03 Thread Jan Baumgart
Seems like [midirealtimein] is working under os x (although there's an obsolete error message midirealtimein: works under MSW only). But when receiving a realtime messages (248, 250 or 252) [midiin] and [notein] output 0. Maybe this is related to the fifo overflow. Correction: the status

Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus?

2013-06-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
From: katja katjavet...@gmail.com To: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at Cc: pddev pd-dev@iem.at Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus? On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On

Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus?

2013-06-03 Thread katja
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: [...] Don't we want to compare straight to ALSA to pd to JACK to ALSA, just with Pd running? Having Pulse in the mix is good to measure as well, but I'd like to get a handle on the JACK adds no latency statement and

Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus?

2013-06-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
From: katja katjavet...@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com Cc: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at; pddev pd-dev@iem.at Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] jack dbus? On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Wilkes