On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 12:42 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
What the patch is doing is deleting an object. The message causing
the
deletion was triggered by (a message that was triggered by[...])
that
object, so what?
There's nothing semantically incorrect in doing that.
There is. You
Hallo,
Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 12:42 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
What the patch is doing is deleting an object. The message causing
the
deletion was triggered by (a message that was triggered by[...])
that
object, so what?
There's
Hallo,
Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
Well, then how should Pd solve the logical pitfalls in your opinion?
mark the object as deletable, if the messaging is happening, wait for
the object to return from the message function, then it can be safely
deleted.
implementing
Am 11.02.2007 um 21:50 schrieb Tim Blechmann:
Well, then how should Pd solve the logical pitfalls in your opinion?
mark the object as deletable, if the messaging is happening, wait for
the object to return from the message function, then it can be safely
deleted.
exactly, but the object
Hallo,
Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
Am 11.02.2007 um 21:50 schrieb Tim Blechmann:
Well, then how should Pd solve the logical pitfalls in your opinion?
mark the object as deletable, if the messaging is happening, wait for
the object to return from the message function,
mark the object as deletable, if the messaging is happening, wait
for
the object to return from the message function, then it can be
safely
deleted.
implementing it shouldn't be difficult as it is completely
compatible
with pd's synchronous architecture.
If I understand it right,
Hallo,
Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
i'm not splitting the logical step, i just change the interpreter state
in a totally predictable way.
I don't know Pd's internals nearly as good as you, but still it seems
to me, that suicides in the middle of a logical step have
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:27 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
i'm not splitting the logical step, i just change the interpreter state
in a totally predictable way.
I don't know Pd's internals nearly as good as you, but still it seems
Bugs item #1518030, was opened at 2006-07-06 11:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1518030group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1518030, was opened at 2006-07-06 11:54
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1518030group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
10 matches
Mail list logo
