On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:26:39PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> As for digest mode, I think it sucks since it makes it hard to reply
> and keep the thread info intact. But I guess there is no discussion
> on pd-cvs, so it would be ok there.
If you subscribe to the list in MIME di
On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hi
any news on this front?
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
We briefly discussed this, I'd like to make a proposition. I
think we
should have the auto-build emails be sent to pd-cvs. I can make them
all come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
any news on this front?
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> We briefly discussed this, I'd like to make a proposition. I think we
> should have the auto-build emails be sent to pd-cvs. I can make them
> all come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Any objections?
after browsing threw the logs on t
On 10 Sep 2006, at 22:56, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
We briefly discussed this, I'd like to make a proposition. I
think we
should have the auto-build emails be sent to pd-cvs. I can make them
all come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any objections?
No objection he
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> We briefly discussed this, I'd like to make a proposition. I think we
> should have the auto-build emails be sent to pd-cvs. I can make them
> all come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Any objections?
>
well, yes: don't run the auto-build as root but as a restricte
We briefly discussed this, I'd like to make a proposition. I think
we should have the auto-build emails be sent to pd-cvs. I can make
them all come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any objections?
.hc
The arc of history ben
