Re: [PD-dev] loader: 0.40 or devel_0_39 ?

2006-12-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The loader in 0.40 takes advantage of the canvas-local paths that were introduced in 0.40. Were any changes made to the loader in devel_0_39 after Thomas' code was included by Miller? .hc On Dec 9, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: I see that the loader code in Miller's 0.40, Mi

Re: [PD-dev] loader: 0.40 or devel_0_39 ?

2006-12-09 Thread Miller Puckette
I believe I tried to apply a patch that added the 'altname' business, which then caused some problems, so I rewrote the code to do the same thing better without the extra parameter. I think the string passed in devel_0_39 is simply passed as "classname" in 0.40. For instance, if someone asks for

[PD-dev] loader: 0.40 or devel_0_39 ?

2006-12-09 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
I see that the loader code in Miller's 0.40, Miller's 0.39 and devel_0_39 are completely different. This means that the diff between the first two and the diff between the latter two, have a lot of conflicts that can't be fixed without sitting down and figuring out what should be done. So, m