Ok, finally, its all cooked into a nice, decently-tested series of
patches against the HEAD of master. This patch set completes a set of
inter-related things related to the Pd window and the logging
functions. I think you'll find it a huge improvement. It is a combo of
work that IOhannes
Hi all,
Sorry to reopen this old thread -- I think there's a more recent message
from HC but I can't find it right now.
I wonder if, in the interest of putting 0.43 out, we should just hide the
verbosity level control and let all printout through for 0.43, then try
to figure out how to do this
I agree that there should only be one set of levels, that would just
mean removing the +4 from two places, and it would be that way.
Tomorrow morning I can complete a patch for 0.43 based on a tested and
debugged version of all this that I have mostly in the pd-extended.git
patch_series
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-23 21:52, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems to me the way to really do this would be to have post() and
logpost() find out the calling object instance on its own, if that's
possible. Then it would automatically apply to all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-22 23:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This would be very nice, I could see being about to double-click any
line in the log and have it pop up which object made the log message. I
won't have time to implement this in the foreseeable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-23 09:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2011-02-22 23:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This would be very nice, I could see being about to double-click any
line in the log and have it pop up which object made the log message. I
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:38 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-23 09:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2011-02-22 23:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This would be very nice, I could see being about to double-click any
line in the log and
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:38 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-23 09:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2011-02-22 23:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This would be very nice, I could see being about to double-click any
line in the log and
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:38 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-23 09:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2011-02-22 23:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This would be very nice, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-22 07:32, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
So how about this:
- keep verbose() as it is
- add logpost(level, message) to both Tcl and C
- change ::pdwindow::post to mirror the C post() i.e. remove level
- remove ::pdwindow::fatal,
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 09:17 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-22 07:32, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
So how about this:
- keep verbose() as it is
- add logpost(level, message) to both Tcl and C
- change ::pdwindow::post to
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:26 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-16 04:53, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you remember why those incr 4 and level+4 are there to begin
yes, so that verbose(0, is not the same as error(
with? I think
On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:26 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-16 04:53, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you remember why those incr 4 and level+4 are there to begin
yes, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-16 04:53, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you remember why those incr 4 and level+4 are there to begin
yes, so that verbose(0, is not the same as error(
with? I think removing that is the best solution,
the duplication should be
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:26 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-16 04:53, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you remember why those incr 4 and level+4 are there to begin
yes, so that verbose(0, is not the same as error(
with? I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-15 01:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hmm, this might be the problem, in doverbose():
sys_vgui(::pdwindow::post %d {%s}\n, level+4, strnescape(upbuf, s,
MAXPDSTRING));
Why is there level+4? Why not just pass level straight
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-15 01:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hmm, this might be the problem, in doverbose():
sys_vgui(::pdwindow::post %d {%s}\n, level+4, strnescape(upbuf, s,
MAXPDSTRING));
Why is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-15 16:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I get the ranked levels, that stuff make sense. I am wondering about
the algorithm. In both C and Tcl, the verbose() posting is adding 4 to
the level value, so that means if people are doing
18 matches
Mail list logo
