Re: [PD-dev] svn:externals sucks, or tracking changes in Gem

2008-09-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: developers together. But it is not working so well now, perhaps because it isn't clearly defined, or because we have different needs now. do you think so? and why? - For Pd-extended, there needs to be a repository to do code freezes and bug fixes, branches

Re: [PD-dev] svn:externals sucks, or tracking changes in Gem

2008-09-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Sep 10, 2008, at 3:26 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: developers together. But it is not working so well now, perhaps because it isn't clearly defined, or because we have different needs now. do you think so? and why? One example: There are lots of

Re: [PD-dev] svn:externals sucks, or tracking changes in Gem

2008-09-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Sorry, I am very slammed right now, so I didn't have time to look at this build issue. I moved everything to point to the Gem SVN now, so it should work fine. thanks Instead of svn:externals, another

Re: [PD-dev] svn:externals sucks, or tracking changes in Gem

2008-09-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Sorry, I am very slammed right now, so I didn't have time to look at this build issue. I moved everything to point to the Gem SVN now, so it should work fine. thanks Instead of svn:externals, another option is to import gem releases into the pure-data

Re: [PD-dev] svn:externals sucks, or tracking changes in Gem

2008-09-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Sorry, I am very slammed right now, so I didn't have time to look at this build issue. I moved everything to point to the Gem SVN now, so it should work fine. Instead of svn:externals, another option is to import gem releases into the pure-data SVN. I am working a lot now with