On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi Miller, clearly for a new devel branch, MAIN would be the right to
start from.
The diff -u between pd 0.39-2 and 0.40-2 is 272k.
The diff -u between pd 0.39-2 and devel_0_39 is 600k.
Without the -u, the ratio between diff sizes becomes slightly
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Well, compatibility would be a lot easier if we had automated tests like
most programming languages
Hi Tim,
you know that pnpd has a different license than pd, not allowing such
usage, except you relicense this part of the code.
The other thing is that i guess it has to be straight C for Miller to
accept it, plus, older gcc versions have problems with intrinsics in c
++ code.
all the
Am 03.12.2006 um 23:35 schrieb Tim Blechmann:
The other thing is that i guess it has to be straight C for Miller
to
accept it,
yes, possibly ...
plus, older gcc versions have problems with intrinsics in c
++ code.
well, older gcc versions have problem with intrinsics in general. ;)
Sorry to be silent on this issue so far...
I'm trying to patch 0.40 and MAIN in parallel - however, I don't
think I've checked MAIN in for a while so they might appeat out of
sync.
I'm also intending to look over devel and incorporate some of its
features into MAIN, but this is a large project
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Thomas Grill wrote:
and obviously i have been assigned the role of the keeper of the
devel,
It's been a while that I've been thinking of you as the keeper of the
devel, and of myself as being a guest.
with all the freedom to make changes where i like, not having to keep
