On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no clue what you're talking about: how mangled would they be? i
don't plan any mangling to happen, except for the presence of \0
characters.
Maybe you don't understand what is being proposed. How
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ascii values from 0 - 31 can be part of symbols that would be nice.
How do you specify a symbol containing ascii values 1 2 and 3? Do they
have names?
Do it the way most languages have borrowed from C : use backslash followed
by an octal or
Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you realise that the quoting problem can be solved independently of the
allocation problem? In that case, you would be able to save any symbol and
read it back. This would solve the problem about CR LF and spaces; only
the problem with \0
De: Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/18 lun. AM 09:45:26 GMT-05:00
À: carmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pd-dev@iem.at
Objet: Re: [PD-dev] strings
On Dec 18, 2006, at 1:23 AM, carmen wrote:
Automatic type conversion sounds like a really bad idea if the
language
De: Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/18 lun. PM 12:11:18 GMT-05:00
À: Martin Peach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pd-dev@iem.at
Objet: Re: [PD-dev] strings
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Martin Peach wrote:
You make them work as strings when they can, and
You make them work as
