Re: pd-extended minimum needs Re: [PD-dev] Re: [GEM-dev] pdextended autobuild august 10th 2006

2006-09-14 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I am sick of build problems, so I am not going to do it. But I'll answer questions where I can. There is some documentation of the Pd-extended makefiles here: http://puredata.org/docs/developer .hc On Sep 2, 2006, at 12:13 PM, B. Bogart wrote: Hello Thomas, Sorry I've taken so long to

Re: pd-extended minimum needs Re: [PD-dev] Re: [GEM-dev] pdextended autobuild august 10th 2006

2006-09-02 Thread B. Bogart
Hello Thomas, Sorry I've taken so long to get back to you. To me option B, to make pd-extended makefiles that build flext w/out the flext build system, seems the best option. Of course I (personally) have little/no understanding of those makefiles. Do you have examples of stand-alone makefiles

Re: pd-extended minimum needs Re: [PD-dev] Re: [GEM-dev] pdextended autobuild august 10th 2006

2006-08-11 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi all, i appreciate your engagement for the pd-extended build system but because of large concert projects in the next weeks (or rather months) i'm currently not able to help you with it. I see three possibilities: - you are using the strange flext build system which is fairly ok documente

pd-extended minimum needs Re: [PD-dev] Re: [GEM-dev] pdextended autobuild august 10th 2006

2006-08-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 10, 2006, at 7:53 PM, B. Bogart wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: also seems pool is missing. I guess I'll have to checkout everything on the laptop and try and build the whole monster myself and see whats going on. No one's gotten that stuff working with the Pd-extended buil