On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Martin Peach wrote:
Bryan Jurish wrote:
all that allocation
and de-allocation at every message just makes my skin crawl... maybe we
should find a better way to do it... or just use Martin's string patches ;-)
When I made the [str] external that uses the string atom, I
trust thing is what worries me. In the last month we had two pleas for
being added as an SF developer by people. who neverever have posted a
single mail to pd-list, at least not with the mail addresses they were
using. Compare that to for example one of the latest new additions,
I was
Bryan Jurish wrote:
moin again,
the fastest lurker on the list...
the new code has been checked into cvs as externals/moocow/pdstring
v0.04 ... let me know if it works (or doesn't)... and send me some
sequence of inputs that reproduces the error if you can find one...
thanks bryan.
i
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:08 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:20:33PM +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Now for the hard part: in Pd, 32-bit floating point tables are stored as
64-but 'atoms' for a 50% hit in memory efficiency. Something Must Be
Done;
but what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Intstore *storepointer;
Intstore *storepointer = new Intstore();
storepointer[arraynumber] = *pointer;
This is the problem. You have only one Intstore object pointed to by
storepointer, but you're assuming you have more than one whenever
arraynumber is not
On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW its a blobtracking external. It is working perfect tracking quicktime
movies but the camera
tracking only works if I exclude the addToArray function. This really has
me scratching my head!
Why would your processing code know or
On Jul 24, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
However in terms of practical security, even though common sense
tells you that more people is more trouble, what matters is whether
their account can be trusted to be them,
Ok I tried with a static array like Class array[amount] and it did not
crash, it worked perfect. Now I
have to figure out what I am doing to cause a crash (with heavy cpu load I
persume, still a bit
confused?) using a dynamic array? It would be nice to have a dynamic array so
as not to eat
It doesn't thats whats confusing me. Pixel data is the same on both exept it
takes more cpu to
process. I think it has to do with cpu load but I am not sure. I think I am
going to just try a simple
Class array[amount] intead of Class *pointer = new Class[amount] see if
that would be easier
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
To say it clearly: I wouldn't want to add people to SF, who are
unknown, unless one of the regulars can vouch for them.
I agree that it should stay like that.
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard -
Feature Requests item #1760589, was opened at 2007-07-25 13:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478073aid=1760589group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a
Patches item #1738839, was opened at 2007-06-17 22:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1738839group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Patches item #1760624, was opened at 2007-07-25 18:01
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1760624group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
13 matches
Mail list logo
