Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
sed -i 's!^\(Depends:.*\)!\1 , libfftw3-3, zlib1g (=
1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-1), libogg0 (= 1.0rc3), liblame0 (= 3.97),
libvorbis0a (= 1.2.0), libgsl0ldbl (= 1.9), libimlib2, libdv4,
tk8.5 (= 8.5.0), libquicktime1 (= 2:1.0.0+debian), libgl1-mesa |
libgl1, libsdl1.2debian
Hi:
I am triying to allocate a n*n matrix of a type defined structure of data.
The pd external object example I'm sending attached is very simple: each time
it receives any message except the clear message it increments a counter and
reallocate a matrix of n*n members where n is the number
Isidro Gonzalez wrote:
Hi:
I am triying to allocate a n*n matrix of a type defined structure of data.
The pd external object example I'm sending attached is very simple: each time
it receives any message except the clear message it increments a counter
and reallocate a matrix of n*n members
Many thanks for your kind answer.
I´m surprised because the way I use to allocate memory is the most commonly
used.
Wouldn´t initializing the pointers to NULL destroy all the contents of previous
memory they hold, if any...? So, why to use realloc this way, then? I would
use free and malloc,
Isidro Gonzalez wrote:
Many thanks for your kind answer.
I´m surprised because the way I use to allocate memory is the most commonly
used.
Wouldn´t initializing the pointers to NULL destroy all the contents of
previous memory they hold, if any...? So, why to use realloc this way,
then? I
