Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 19:10, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > Btw-- in your live-coding example you mentioned you were sending > the audio to a bus and would use [initbang] to fade in. But > how do you use [closebang] to fade out? Does [closebang] send > a trigger to one of the sister abstractions to do t

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread Frank Barknecht
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:40:59AM -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > > > > [createbang] and [destroybang] is a nice pair. :) > > .hc > > But then we'd need [evolvebang] and [extinctbang] ... Unless you patches are intelligently designed. :) Ciao -- Frank _

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread Matt Barber
>> >> so you cannot use [initbang] to initialize the parent patch. >> darn, bad naming again. >> probably [createbang] would be better (esp. if [closebang] is renamed to >> [destroybang]) >> or use [constructorbang] and [destructorbang] > > [createbang] and [destroybang] is a nice pair. :) > > .hc

Re: [PD-dev] buildbot or some other proper build automation

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:20 PM, András Murányi wrote: I'm working on the master config... One thing it needs is the (domain name and) port number where buildbot's own http server will be visible. Default is 8010. I guess it just needs to be open to the WAN and that's it. I think 8010 and 10

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:07 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-23 17:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Yeah, we definitely don't want [initbang] to be used too often, I can i would also like to state, that we shouldn't use [metro] too often. reversely, one cannot use [trigger] too ofte

Re: [PD-dev] buildbot or some other proper build automation

2010-08-23 Thread András Murányi
> > I'm working on the master config... >> One thing it needs is the (domain name and) port number where buildbot's >> own http server will be visible. Default is 8010. I guess it just needs to >> be open to the WAN and that's it. >> >> >> I think 8010 and 10012 are not filtered on that network. >

Re: [PD-dev] buildbot or some other proper build automation

2010-08-23 Thread András Murányi
> > I'm working on the master config... > One thing it needs is the (domain name and) port number where buildbot's > own http server will be visible. Default is 8010. I guess it just needs to > be open to the WAN and that's it. > > > I think 8010 and 10012 are not filtered on that network. > cool

Re: [PD-dev] buildbot or some other proper build automation

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:16 PM, András Murányi wrote: 2010/8/22 Hans-Christoph Steiner On Aug 20, 2010, at 9:27 PM, András Murányi wrote: 2010/8/20 Hans-Christoph Steiner Could you make a copy your id_rsa.pub, give all read perms, and put it into /home/pd on your zero machine? Then I'll s

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Mon, 8/23/10, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > From: IOhannes m zmoelnig > Subject: Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43 > To: pd-dev@iem.at > Date: Monday, August 23, 2010, 6:07 PM > On 2010-08-23 17:33, Hans-Christoph > Steiner wrote: > > > > Yeah, we definitely

Re: [PD-dev] template Makefile

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I think these enhancements are definitely useful and good, but some belong elsewhere. The key focus of this template is to be as simple as possible and represent only the most common types of libraries. Then it provides an easy place to get started. It is not meant to work for every ki

[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-3051663 ] make slipdec reassemble arbitrary packages

2010-08-23 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #3051663, was opened at 2010-08-23 18:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3051663&group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of t

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 17:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Yeah, we definitely don't want [initbang] to be used too often, I can i would also like to state, that we shouldn't use [metro] too often. reversely, one cannot use [trigger] too often. so Pd should print out a warning if there is no [t] in t

Re: [PD-dev] initbang and friends WAS: run-up to release 0.43

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hi, On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:02:08PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Aug 20, 2010, at 5:42 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: I'm saying I like the interface of having a suite of objects called *bang rather than [loadbang close], etc.