-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 03:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ah, ok, that changes things. So you are sure there isn't a way to make
this work?
on, i'm not sure. i only reported issues i came across.
If so, do you think there are other shared
Hi Hans IOhannes Martin
I'd love to have the iemnet library included in Pd-extended and wanted
to hear other opinions.
I'd do the work, if everyone agrees.
Roman
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Bugs item #3415380, was opened at 2011-09-29 10:57
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=3415380group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Fine by me, if you are the maintainer. I was also thinking of adding
Martin's 'net' library as its own thing.
And since we're on the topic, I was not happy how the iemnet fork
happened, I think it was disrespectful of Martin.
.hc
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:22 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi
Hey Roman,
I just saw this commit:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/Makefile?r1=15393r2=15397
.la files generally should not be installed, that makes sense to me.
This seems like a heavy hand to do a global deletion for something
like this. The
On Sep 29, 2011, at 2:49 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 03:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ah, ok, that changes things. So you are sure there isn't a way to
make
this work?
on, i'm not sure. i only reported issues i came
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:15:20AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I just saw this commit:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/Makefile?r1=15393r2=15397
.la files generally should not be installed, that makes sense to me.
Actually, in general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Roman,
I just saw this commit:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/Makefile?r1=15393r2=15397
.la files generally should not be installed, that makes
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:37 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Roman,
I just saw this commit:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/Makefile?r1=15393r2=15397
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What is the problem this is trying to solve? How are the .la files
causing problems ? The Pd-extended is crufty enough as it is with lots
of kludges like this that I'm mostly responsible for.
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:52 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What is the problem this is trying to solve? How are the .la files
causing problems ? The Pd-extended is crufty enough as it is with
FYI, I upgraded the Mac OS X 10.4 i386 build server to 10.5.8, since
there are some APIs that are needed that were introduced on 10.5. I'm
planning on keeping the ppc build machine at 10.4 (I should reboot
that so it works again...)
.hc
what happened?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote:
Fine by me, if you are the maintainer. I was also thinking of adding
Martin's 'net' library as its own thing.
And since we're on the topic, I was not happy how the iemnet fork happened,
I think it
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:00 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:52 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What is the problem this is trying to solve? How are the .la
On Sep 29, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:00 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:52 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-09-29 17:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What is the problem
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:04:12AM -0400, Chris McCormick wrote:
Argh, please hold on a second. I have just realised that I do not
have the
authority to do this. I should have asked two other people who
contributed
unit tests. Sorry
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
To: Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
Cc: Chris McCormick ch...@mccormick.cx; pd-dev@iem.at pd-dev@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Unit tests
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:27 AM,
(moving to pd-dev...)
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 01:38:54AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
So, if I understand correctly, you are suggesting that these key bindings
would only take effect while actively editing the text of an Object, Message,
or Comment. If that's the case, +1 -- I agree.
Bugs item #3415638, was opened at 2011-09-29 22:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by reakin
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=3415638group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
