Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:24 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Tim Blechmann wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes. it's possible to switch off the digest mode for pd-cvs and forward the autobuild mails to the trash. ähm, if you choose to receive pd-cvs in non-digest mode, you should also be possible to select the cvs topic (and not no-topic (which is equivalent to ALL topics) or the autobuild topic). in this case you should not receive autobuild emails. ah, cool ... thanks ... tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk Silence is only frightening to people who are compulsively verbalizing. William S. Burroughs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes. it's possible to switch off the digest mode for pd-cvs and forward the autobuild mails to the trash. not a solution, just a hack ... tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk There's no such entity as most people. These are generalities. All generalities are meaningless. You've got to pin it down to a specific person doing a specific thing at a specific time and space. William S. Burroughs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb: I reduced the autobuild report from 200 to 20 lines. That should help. I was hoping to have the autobuild reports not in the digest so that they are more apparent. That sounds like a good solution. I have to say that I am very surprised that the autobuilds aren't being used by vibrez/devel, especially when working towards a release. It makes that job much, much easier. vibrez is a project that aims at good stability, hence it's too dangerous to compile directly from the cvs. Concerning pd-devel, it might be worth looking into it, although it's more urgent to merge in the changes from 0.40 best greetings, Thomas -- Thomas Grill http://g.org ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:42 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means more cooperation. then i'm proposing to change the name from pd-cvs into [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;) sorry ... just kidding ... tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk All we composers really have to work with is time and sound - and sometimes I'm not even sure about sound. Morton Feldman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
