Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-13 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: What's the SVN equivalent of the CVSROOT directory? there is no CVSROOT equivalent in subversion. Ok, I thought that there could be either a hidden folder or some metadata that does not count as part of the repository itself, but is still

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-13 Thread zmoelnig
Quoting Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I think Matju is talking about the CVSROOT section of CVS, where things like 'avail', 'cvsignore', and things like that. yes, this is what i had in mind when i answered. I suspect that svn+ssh

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-12 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: Ah, how is that something that SF has to setup themselves?... I have never been admin on a SF.net project, so, I don't know, but wouldn't that only be about whether a web interface is available for handling the ACL ? What's the

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-12 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Frank Barknecht wrote: I'd say, that as we now have no ACL anymore, So, what is it with the ACL ? Is it that SVN doesn't have support for that, or just that the ACL config has to be rewritten for SVN

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Frank Barknecht wrote: I'd say, that as we now have no ACL anymore, So, what is it with the ACL ? Is it that SVN doesn't have support for that, or just that the ACL config has to be rewritten for SVN because of incompatible formats?

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-11 Thread Miller Puckette
In the CVS days, my process was to test my latest source tree on the three major platforms, then put the sources both on my website and in the repository. (for minor changes that didn't warrant a test release number I'd just upload to CVS but not before verifying everything.) So both the

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-11 Thread David Plans Casal
Hi On 10 Feb 2008, at 22:58, Frank Barknecht wrote: And if so, what's the appropriate branch? branches/pd? branches / pd / pd-0.40-3? I'd say, that as we now have no ACL anymore, care should be taken when working on the Pd sources itself. So far, Miller had his own section that was

[PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-10 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, David Plans Casal hat gesagt: // David Plans Casal wrote: Now that we have a nice clean SVN repo, can I just use svn diff and apply this patch myself? And if so, what's the appropriate branch? branches/pd? branches / pd / pd-0.40-3? I'd say, that as we now have no ACL anymore,

Re: [PD-dev] Protecting Pd-MAIN [was: Re: [PD] Problem in os x 10.5.1?]

2008-02-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Feb 10, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, David Plans Casal hat gesagt: // David Plans Casal wrote: Now that we have a nice clean SVN repo, can I just use svn diff and apply this patch myself? And if so, what's the appropriate branch? branches/pd? branches / pd /