On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:39 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> > On 02/28/2013 23:25, András Murányi wrote:
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> I've recently built miXed/toxy for pd-l2ork successfully but now I've
> run
> >> into errors with pd-exte
On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:39 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 23:25, András Murányi wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I've recently built miXed/toxy for pd-l2ork successfully but now I've run
>> into errors with pd-extended. The errors concern tot.
>> I've noticed that they are not the same versi
On 02/28/2013 23:25, András Murányi wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've recently built miXed/toxy for pd-l2ork successfully but now I've run
> into errors with pd-extended. The errors concern tot.
> I've noticed that they are not the same version (see the diff below),
> however copying the l2ork one over t
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> You defintely want .x%lx and not .x%x. .x%lx is needed for working 64-bit
> support.
>
> .hc
>
>
That's good because it has .x%lx in pd-extended. This is the output I get
(looks like it has not been fully prepared for 64-bit?):
You defintely want .x%lx and not .x%x. .x%lx is needed for working 64-bit
support.
.hc
On 02/28/2013 05:25 PM, András Murányi wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've recently built miXed/toxy for pd-l2ork successfully but now I've run
> into errors with pd-extended. The errors concern tot.
> I've noticed
Hi list,
I've recently built miXed/toxy for pd-l2ork successfully but now I've run
into errors with pd-extended. The errors concern tot.
I've noticed that they are not the same version (see the diff below),
however copying the l2ork one over the extended one doesn't solve the
problem but triggers
