Hi all,
seems like the s-abstraction folder has already been checked in, because
now all the .svn subfolders are in the CVS... that's not exactly what
was intended, i guess.
greetings, Thomas
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Mon, Jul
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:03:47AM +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
seems like the s-abstraction folder has already been checked in, because
now all the .svn subfolders are in the CVS... that's not exactly what
was intended, i guess.
Hi Thomas,
Yep, I screwed up. Will fix ASAP.
Best,
Chris.
On Jul 6, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
What about a SVN at goto10.org ?
We at goto10
On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:21:37AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe it would be a good idea to try to organize a repository
management workshop or panel or so during the pd~convention. I guess,
most people involved in the repository will
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:33:56PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
Sounds good! I will stop pestering the list about it then and wait
until
after pd~convention to commit s-abstractions when there is some
resolution about the
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:49:29AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Well as it stands now I'd have the annoying requirement that I keep
two local copies of s-abstractions and have to manually port changes
between them and commit to two different repositories, which was the
reason for my
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:49:29AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
Well as it stands now I'd have the annoying requirement that I keep
two local copies of s-abstractions and have to manually port changes
between them and commit to
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:21:37AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe it would be a good idea to try to organize a repository
management workshop or panel or so during the pd~convention. I guess,
most people involved in the repository will be there and it may be
easier to deal with these
Hi,
What about a SVN at goto10.org ?
a
2007/7/4, Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 12:56:05PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:50:00AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
but puredata.info
Hallo,
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
I guess what I am getting at is; are we still transitioning to SVN? Can
we do it soon, because it will make my life much easier. :)
I don't think we will transition to svn any time soon.
Every time I suggested to do that, the
Chris McCormick wrote:
1. IEM? (is this an option?)
pros:
cons: lots of work for IOhannes.
2. savanna.nongnu.org
pros:
cons:
3. Rent a dedicated server.
pros: we have total control.
cons: we have to install and set up. costs money.
i do not fully understand the difference between
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:50:00AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
1. IEM? (is this an option?)
pros:
cons: lots of work for IOhannes.
2. savanna.nongnu.org
pros:
cons:
3. Rent a dedicated server.
pros: we have total control.
cons: we
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
My only other big problem, afair, is that I can't handle a list of people
who have commit access to my particular projects, there has to be one big
centralised list for the whole 'pure-data' project. In one sense, that's
not
I say do it!
:D
.hc
On Jun 27, 2007, at 6:40 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i would like to file a request to sourceforge that they remove the
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ directory from the pd-
repository.
reasoning:
- the entire tree is obviously supposed to be a mirror of another
14 matches
Mail list logo
