I think Hans means normalised _input_ parameters,
not output range. When I specified
duty cycle it's common to say that in percent, of course
we should normalise control params.
Okay cool, sorry I misunderstood.
Steve
___
PD-dev mailing list
By the way, don't forget that there are good band-limited
implementations of a bunch of waveforms in STK / Chuck that you can
totally borrow.
The most recent version was published with an actual license that
makes it more clearly useable in other projects.
Steve
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:25:04 -0500
Stephen Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, don't forget that there are good band-limited
implementations of a bunch of waveforms in STK / Chuck that you can
totally borrow.
The most recent version was published with an actual license that
makes
Yes! Must have implemented them all a hundered times over
by now and getting rather fed up of it.
I suggest the names
sqrosc~ (50% duty cycle standard square)
sqrblosc~ (bandlimited square type)
triosc~ (standard triangle)
triblosc~ (bandlimited triangle)
pwmosc~ (pulse width
There are a number of standard oscillators used in synthesis, I think
it would be very useful to have a standard library of them. I think
at this point there are already implementations of all of the
oscillators that I can think of, what needs to be done now is to
define a standard
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 12:43 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
There are a number of standard oscillators used in synthesis, I think
it would be very useful to have a standard library of them. I think
at this point there are already implementations of all of the
oscillators that I can
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 23:20 +, Andy Farnell wrote:
Yes! Must have implemented them all a hundered times over
by now and getting rather fed up of it.
excuse my ignorance, but where can i find them? are those abstractions?
what externals do they rely on?
roman
Nothing to excuse there Roman, I just vaguely meant I've built
them from scratch as needed in vanilla many many times. They'll be
littered about various synths, some posted here, some on the forum
some just kicking about my private stash.
Pulling all the common oscillators together into a lib
I think we can safely eliminate the osc from the names since there
won't be a lot of overlap. Also, since everything is a float, I
think it makes sense to standardize on 0-to-1 range. That's the
standard range for amplitude, OpenGL colors, and the mapping library,
and I think it makes sense
I think Hans means normalised _input_ parameters,
not output range. When I specified
duty cycle it's common to say that in percent, of course
we should normalise control params.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:02:51 -0500
Stephen Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we can safely eliminate the
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
I think we can safely eliminate the osc from the names since there
won't be a lot of overlap. Also, since everything is a float, I
think it makes sense to standardize on 0-to-1 range. That's the
standard range for amplitude, OpenGL
11 matches
Mail list logo
