On Oct 30, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Steffen Juul wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2007, at 21.31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Miller has some hidden secrets, I am not really sure how he does
>> it. I have some tricks as well, they are in packages/darwin_app/
>> Makefile :)
>
> It's a shame Millers doesn't w
On Oct 30, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Steffen Juul wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Since you are interested in the GUI, sounds like it would be best
>> if you worked on that. For example, a real preferences pane with
>> tabs on it would be really nice. I'll happi
On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Since you are interested in the GUI, sounds like it would be best
> if you worked on that. For example, a real preferences pane with
> tabs on it would be really nice. I'll happily help you make that
> happen, if you interested. The
On 29/10/2007, at 21.31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Miller has some hidden secrets, I am not really sure how he does
> it. I have some tricks as well, they are in packages/darwin_app/
> Makefile :)
It's a shame Millers doesn't want do share his tricks.
I again tried to imitate the darwi
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Steffen Juul wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> First off, you'll have much better luck with this Tcl/Tk than the
>> Apple ones. The included ones are quite old, this is what I just
>> upgraded the auto-builds to:
>>
>> http://
On 29/10/2007, at 14.07, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote:
>
>> This was the building part. Now the apply patches part. Before i
>> blast it all i'd like to know if i could be of any help wrt pd-
>> extended? Is the next Pd-extended aimaed at the 0.41 versio
On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> First off, you'll have much better luck with this Tcl/Tk than the
> Apple ones. The included ones are quite old, this is what I just
> upgraded the auto-builds to:
>
> http://idmi.poly.edu/pdlab/tcltk/
Not asking where you dug that up
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 28/10/2007, at 1.35, Steffen Juul wrote:
I've been meaning to try that for quite some time. That and then
apply
some of the patches that i like. We'll see how it goes, when it goes.
I had success building pd-0.41-0test06 for Intel Mac O
Hallo,
Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote:
> This was the building part. Now the apply patches part. Before i
> blast it all i'd like to know if i could be of any help wrt pd-
> extended? Is the next Pd-extended aimaed at the 0.41 version of Pd or
> the 0.40 version? Are there any
On 28/10/2007, at 1.35, Steffen Juul wrote:
> I've been meaning to try that for quite some time. That and then apply
> some of the patches that i like. We'll see how it goes, when it goes.
I had success building pd-0.41-0test06 for Intel Mac OS X. What I did
was:
- Made the following symlinks
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> the only reasoning behind the .deb is to get the dependencies right.
> apart from that, i agree to frank.
>
> one hack to solve this would be to distribute pd-extended as .tgz and
> additionally provide a "pd-extended-deps" pa
On Oct 28, 2007, at 4:53 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> And as an experiment, I made a new autobuild called "pd-main+libs",
>> which is Pd straight from the HEAD of MAIN and the rest of Pd-
>> extended. None of the p
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> And as an experiment, I made a new autobuild called "pd-main+libs",
>> which is Pd straight from the HEAD of MAIN and the rest of Pd-
>> extended. None of the patches are included tho, so
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> And as an experiment, I made a new autobuild called "pd-main+libs",
> which is Pd straight from the HEAD of MAIN and the rest of Pd-
> extended. None of the patches are included tho, so it shouldn't be
> considered
MinGW extra fixes
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=1561814&group_id=55736&atid=478072
I thought I would get to making ./configure && make work on MinGW,
but I didn't. So this MinGW Makefile should be included (my fault):
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func
Hmm, I had no idea that come of teh HC patches were actually necessary
in order to be able to compile Pd extended on OSX or Windows... which
patches are they?
thanks
M
> >
> > (...) I need to patch Miller's sources in order to make builds
> > on Windows and Mac OS X.
>
> Hmm.. I thought buildi
On 28/10/2007, at 1.28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Hallo,
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> Also, I don't switch to Miller's next version till he's done with
>>> the
>>> bugfix releases.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> The thing that holds back Pd-extended is that very few people help to
>> work on a proper release cycle, meaning make a release branch, do
>> lots of testing, a
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> The thing that holds back Pd-extended is that very few people help to
> work on a proper release cycle, meaning make a release branch, do
> lots of testing, and fix the bugs. With more help, this would go
> faster.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> Now with Pd-0.39.3-extended finally out, I'd like to talk about
>> setting the timetable for the next Pd-extended release.
>
> Would this also be a time to talk
On Oct 27, 2007, at 6:15 AM, Steffen Juul wrote:
> On Sat, October 27, 2007 11:52 am, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> (...) there are no autobuilds of just the externals. Making these
>> could
>> be a first step towards a two-fold pd-extended release.
>
> I support that idea, especially for it modula
On Sat, October 27, 2007 11:52 am, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> (...) there are no autobuilds of just the externals. Making these could
> be a first step towards a two-fold pd-extended release.
I support that idea, especially for it modular perspective: One could use
the "extensions" module either wit
Hallo,
Georg Holzmann hat gesagt: // Georg Holzmann wrote:
> Hm ... does it make sense to skip 0.40 and go directly to 0.41 ?
IMO yes, although 0.41 is a moving target. But looking at how long a
pd-extended release can take, it's likely that Miller's 0.41 will be
released earlier.
> But there a
Hallo!
> Would this also be a time to talk about possible structural changes to
> address some problems of Pd-extended? One problem I see is that the
> releases are too old. pd-0.39 is from 2005. Of course one can try
> shorter release cycles, but people are only so fast, and we're facing
> a two-
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Now with Pd-0.39.3-extended finally out, I'd like to talk about
> setting the timetable for the next Pd-extended release.
Would this also be a time to talk about possible structural changes to
address some problems o
Yup, you don't have Bitstream Vera Sans Mono working/installed. It
has a distinctive lower L.
.hc
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Here's a new pic demonstrating the issue, by the way (I'll add it
to the tracker)
The 1px wide canvas is demonstrating where I am clicki
Here's a new pic demonstrating the issue, by the way (I'll add it to the
tracker)
The 1px wide canvas is demonstrating where I am clicking, and the actual
cursor is visible to show the result.
On 10/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blo
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:05 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with
the extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling
in object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/
mtx_*~ and so on (though I believe IOh
>
> Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with the
> extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling in
> object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/mtx_*~ and so
> on (though I believe IOhannes may have fixed that recently?).
>
>
>
> What mi
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with
the extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling
in object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/
mtx_*~ and so on (though I believe IOh
Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with the
extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling in
object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/mtx_*~ and so
on (though I believe IOhannes may have fixed that recently?).
Oh, it would also be cool
Hey all,
Now with Pd-0.39.3-extended finally out, I'd like to talk about
setting the timetable for the next Pd-extended release. I think it's
a good idea to set a code freeze/branch date at the end of the year.
Then spend one month on release candidates, and aim to have a final
release
32 matches
Mail list logo
