Em ter., 12 de mar. de 2024 às 04:48, Miller Puckette <
mpucke...@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
> I'm thinking of making a release mid April (assuming things go well) and
> so I should probably call for a freeze late March. As usual I plan to
> merge in "devel" and "Documentation" - in fact I should
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 11:49 +0100, Christof Ressi wrote:
>
> 1. Please consider my scheduler improvements:
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1756
>
> I have been using this for 1 1/2 years now, both in my daily patching
> and in big concerts (including an opera production!), and I
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 08:47 +0100, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Incidentally: I just noticed that the IEM slider object (and proabbly
> other EM GUIs) spits out a number when clicked upon, even if not
> dragged. Is this desirable behavior? It caught me out buit perhaps
> other users are actually
hi,
excited to hear about an upcoming Pd0.55!
> This has always been the case as far as i know (and I've just tested on
> 0.43.0 and it was already true).
> I don't think this should change...
+1 ... and just wanted to add to this: it might not be the obvious
behavior for steady-on-click
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 04:48 Miller Puckette
wrote:
> possibly a menu extension for dragging new "data" onto the screen;
Not sure what you mean, can you elaborate? I have this PR for adding
objects, is it something like this?
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1917
@miller:
> I just noticed that the IEM slider object spits out a number when clicked
> upon
This has always been the case as far as i know (and I've just tested on
0.43.0 and it was already true).
I don't think this should change...
Le mar. 12 mars 2024 à 14:34, Alexandre Torres Porres a
I replied without seeing other messages, sorry, in a rush here :)
Em ter., 12 de mar. de 2024 às 10:20, Alexandre Torres Porres <
por...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Some PRs for that
>
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2059
> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1978
>
hi, so it's 0.55 season, good news! I'll focus on that now ;)
I wanna stress and suggest one of the immediate goals must be improving
multichannel stuff, there are some objects that still miss it and it'd be
nice if a multichannel connection would be visibly distinct.
Some PRs for that
Hi Miller,
thanks a lot! Sounds way less scary :)
Cheers,
Christof
On 12.03.2024 12:06, Miller Puckette wrote:
Effectively, what I'm hoping to do is start merging soon, assuming
nobody objects, but to stop admitting new features after a couple of
weeks so that we can have most of April to
Effectively, what I'm hoping to do is start merging soon, assuming
nobody objects, but to stop admitting new features after a couple of
weeks so that we can have most of April to look at what we've got and
fix bugs (but not try to add stuff). so the "freeze" period would be as
long as people
Hi Miller,
good to hear from you!
Just a question: since you plan to add new features, this would be Pd
0.55 - and not Pd 0.54.2 - right?
I'm thinking of making a release mid April (assuming things go well)
and so I should probably call for a freeze late March.
That's a pretty narrow merge
To Pd dev -
I'm thinking of making a release mid April (assuming things go well) and
so I should probably call for a freeze late March. As usual I plan to
merge in "devel" and "Documentation" - in fact I should do a first merge
rather soon, assuming things are in a good state for merging.
12 matches
Mail list logo
