Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
On 1/9/2021 7:38 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: As I preannounced at one point earlier, and to the surprise of nobody, I have plans on integrating this into ELSE Are you sure you want ELSE to be so difficult to build just for a single [fluidsynth~] object? Mensaje telepatico asistido

Re: [PD-dev] OFFLIST Re: building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
haha, I really screwed this one and deleted the wrong email  sorry! Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 19:50, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > I don't feel like debating this rather personal matter on the Pd list, and > it's kind of a digression, but yeah, I hear you, it's a

[PD-dev] OFFLIST Re: building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
I don't feel like debating this rather personal matter on the Pd list, and it's kind of a digression, but yeah, I hear you, it's a pain in the ass, but I have thought about it and the answer is: yes! :) we can keep talking about this here if you like cheers Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 19:45,

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 15:15, IOhannes m zmölnig escreveu: > probably (if simple enough) you could (also) provide an abstraction that > exposes the original API. > Well, as soon as I get rid of the compatibility constraints, I just get ideas. And instead of having messages that match

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
On 1/9/2021 2:39 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: What feels sane for me is creating a new object, with a different name (fluidsynth~) and its own design that is cleaner and doesn't try to fix this compatibility issues, cause it's just a nightmare with no simple solution. I like the idea of

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
Am 9. Jänner 2021 18:39:30 MEZ schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres : > > What feels sane for me is creating a new object, with a different name > (fluidsynth~) and its own design that is cleaner and doesn't try to > fix > this compatibility issues, cause it's just a nightmare with no simple >

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Ok, for reference, this says that although program change numbers are from 0-127, there's no standard and some devices can index from 1, and I see Pd does index from 1, see: - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/master/src/x_midi.c#L307

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 12:33, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > +-+-+--+--+ > |Bank | PC | Name* | Info. | > +-+-+--+--+ > | 000 | 000 | 1 [

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 12:25, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > So, I tested HedOrgan-B3-Presets-V84d.sf3 and I get silence too, but only > in the first program, if I change to program 2 or higher, I get sounds. > What about you? > Hmm, by checking

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
So, I tested HedOrgan-B3-Presets-V84d.sf3 and I get silence too, but only in the first program, if I change to program 2 or higher, I get sounds. What abou you? Em sáb., 9 de jan. de 2021 às 08:28, Roman Haefeli escreveu: > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 20:18 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > >

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 12:28 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > The fluidsynth command utility loads and plays the example SF3-file I > found fine. [fluid~] says it loaded it, but I get only silence when > playing notes. [fluid~] works with /usr/share/sounds/sf3/MuseScore_General_Lite.sf3 from the

Re: [PD-dev] building fluid~ on Linux (was: [PD] fluid~ for Pd-Vanilla - test version)

2021-01-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 20:18 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > Em sex., 8 de jan. de 2021 às 19:21, Roman Haefeli < > reduz...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:47 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 12:29 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > > > > >