Re: [PD-dev] Signing deken packages

2022-11-29 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
Am 30. November 2022 00:35:47 MEZ schrieb Thomas Mayer : >Hello, > >I have uploaded packages to deken, but have just found out, that these >packages were not signed correctly with my gpg key for reasons totally >unrelated to deken. > >Should I reupload the packages or should I sign these

[PD-dev] Signing deken packages

2022-11-29 Thread Thomas Mayer
Hello, I have uploaded packages to deken, but have just found out, that these packages were not signed correctly with my gpg key for reasons totally unrelated to deken. Should I reupload the packages or should I sign these packages with gpg, get the signature extension .gpg (or .asc or

Re: [PD-dev] release time?

2022-11-29 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Em ter., 29 de nov. de 2022 às 13:32, Antoine Rousseau escreveu: > we should retire the public iemgui API >> > > does this mean that mknob (or iemgui library) would have to be entirely > rewritten, by copying/adapting the entire iemgui API to mkob source tree? > I think that adapting is really

Re: [PD-dev] release time?

2022-11-29 Thread Antoine Rousseau
> > we should retire the public iemgui API > does this mean that mknob (or iemgui library) would have to be entirely rewritten, by copying/adapting the entire iemgui API to mkob source tree? not caring about ABI breakage > the ABI compatibility is already broken IIUC ;-) GUI objects aren't