[PD-dev] sqrt/(not q8_sqrt) for 0.54

2023-06-05 Thread Sebastian Shader via Pd-dev
As long as we're bringing attention to things to get into 0.54, it would be nice to finally resolve the sqrt/q8_sqrt differenceshttps://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1906https://github.com/pure-data/pddp/issues/125and the osc/cos symmetry

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
>> On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 11:46 +0200, Miller Puckette wrote: >> Pdouble? > > Pd? pdpd? enohp ym morf tnes --- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread Benjamin Wesch
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, 15:27 Roman Haefeli wrote: > Pd² or actually doubling it to pdpd? ... which could be read as pure double precision data. I do prefer pd64 though despite the possible confusion - assuming that semantics for names and endings are clearly (enough) different.

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 11:46 +0200, Miller Puckette wrote: > Pdouble? Pd² Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread cyrille henry
Pdd Le 05/06/2023 à 11:44, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit : On 6/4/23 17:22, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: well, great then, cause it's been merged :) time to get ready for double precision finally then I guess! Really excited about it <3 the other question that ought to answered is: how do we

[PD-dev] Pd 0.54 macOS stuff etc?

2023-06-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
Howdy all, if we are in a release cycle, is there anything major I can look at? I’m thinking of Tk 8.6.13 for macOS builds, etc. enohp ym morf tnes --- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
I agree the “64” naming, while technically correct, will just get mixed up with architecture. Too bad “dp” is already used by pddp. I now think of “wide” pd but that’s perhaps too general, although could be fun. enohp ym morf tnes --- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread Miller Puckette
Pdouble? On 6/5/23 11:44, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 6/4/23 17:22, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: well, great then, cause it's been merged :) time to get ready for double precision finally then I guess! Really excited about it <3 the other question that ought to answered is: how do we

Re: [PD-dev] double precision pd?

2023-06-05 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 6/4/23 17:22, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: well, great then, cause it's been merged :) time to get ready for double precision finally then I guess! Really excited about it <3 the other question that ought to answered is: how do we actually call it in order to prevent confusion? "Pd