Hello,
BTW, did anyone made a benchmark :
"pd double" will of course be lot's slower on 32 bit architecture, but what
about 64 bit architecture?
Will "pd double" perform as fast as "pd float" on modern computer? or do we
need to have both version installed on the same computer? (some patch need
Em qua., 7 de jun. de 2023 às 11:43, IOhannes m zmoelnig
escreveu:
> i think one of the questions is, where the name will actually be exposed.
>
> - of course, the webpage (https://msp.ucsd.edu/, https://puredata.info/)
> cou use whatever descriptive name to lure the people into downloading
>
On 6/7/23 12:55, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 10:47, Lucas Cordiviola a
écrit :
For me pd64 gives more chances of confusion than pdd or pdpd.
(...)
Starting with a new name of the app seems the most sane.
Funnily, my personal feeling is the opposite :-)
I feel that
>
> My trouble with Pd64 is that it will get listed next to Pd in almost any
> package manager and may be many people
> opt Pd64 (thinking that is the one for 64bit cpus)
I think almost all (recent) package managers no longer offer 32bit-CPU
packages?...
Antoine
Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 13:08,
Funnily, my personal feeling is the opposite :-)
I feel that Pd64 clearly describes Pd working with 64 bit data.
I myself don't have any trouble with whatever name we use as I know
perfectly well the situation. My trouble with Pd64 is that it will get
listed next to Pd in almost any package
Le mer. 7 juin 2023 à 10:47, Lucas Cordiviola a
écrit :
> For me pd64 gives more chances of confusion than pdd or pdpd.
>
(...)
> Starting with a new name of the app seems the most sane.
>
Funnily, my personal feeling is the opposite :-)
I feel that Pd64 clearly describes Pd working with 64
For me pd64 gives more chances of confusion than pdd or pdpd.
Apart from the name of the app we should try to give this new app as
much separation of Pd's paths and preferences as we can.
Starting with a new name of the app seems the most sane.
--
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
