Not really that we have to do this but:
Surely we need 2 compilations but in my head it does not hurt much that
certain files have their "64" appended in the filename and share the
same bin and extra dir.
like
pd/bin
pd.exe
pd64.exe
pd.com
pd64.com
pd.dll
pd64.dll
My gut feeling is that this is best kept as two separate builds for the
platform. IMO we don't want to have to resort to a lot of trickery fighting the
system's preferred modus operandi as it will, as you write, likely blow up in
our faces.
> On Jun 12, 2023, at 12:00 PM,
On 6/8/23 15:23, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Oh no, compilation will be complex.
Not really.
You basically have to build twice...
oh no, i forgot about the intricacies of the windows build.
with macOS and Linux we have this nice single "pd" binary (or "pd64").
but with Windows we need the
