[PD-dev] Windows 64-bit build of Pd-extended

2010-09-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey mescalinum, I am posting your 64-bit build of Pd-extended for Windows to see if anyone wants to try it: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/89643/pd/Pd-0.43.0-x64-extended-20100915.exe Also, I was hoping you'd be up for trying a 64-bit build of the newly released Pd-extended 0.42.5. .hc

Re: [PD-dev] Join the Compile Farm (was Re: 64-bit build for, Windows?)

2010-09-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
If you are still game, I would start with the code from git, and once you get that working, then you can try to take on Pd-extended! That means compiling lots of libraries. .hc On Sep 9, 2010, at 2:57 AM, Pierre-Olivier Boulant wrote: Hi, I got some help from a hackerlab here in

Re: [PD-dev] Join the Compile Farm (was Re: 64-bit build for, Windows?)

2010-09-17 Thread Pierre-Olivier Boulant
Hi, I haven't given up. I've seen Mescalinum has succeeded in a first compilation. That's great news and also the release of pd-ext 0.42.5. I have a lot of work until the end of the month as I told you, I won't have much time to look into this. I'll get back to you as soon as I get this

[PD-dev] ubuntu-lucid-amd64 build missing dependencies

2010-09-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
So I am trying to debug a strange bug. Basically, the package build on the ubuntu-lucid-amd64 machine does not put the lib dependencies into the package because it only finds libc6 (= 2.4), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1). The Depends: is generated in packages/linux_make/Makefile by this line:

Re: [PD-dev] Join the Compile Farm (was Re: 64-bit build for, Windows?)

2010-09-17 Thread András Murányi
I was just taking a look at how many different nightly builds we have vs. the PdLab page vs. the current buildbot setup. Please update me with these: Debian squeeze, Debian etch : chroot on 128.238.56.50, right? Ubuntu Hardy LPIA : chroot on 128.238.56.55 Ubuntu Karmic i386, Ubuntu Karmic LPIA :