Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29

2006-11-29 Thread Tim Blechmann
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:24 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Tim Blechmann wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become

Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29

2006-11-28 Thread Tim Blechmann
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:31 +0100, Thomas Grill wrote: Hi all, would it be possible to exclude the autobuild results from this digest, like e.g. by making a separate mailing for that. It's has become absolutely impossible to track the cvs changes. it's possible to switch off the digest mode

Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29

2006-11-28 Thread Thomas Grill
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb: I reduced the autobuild report from 200 to 20 lines. That should help. I was hoping to have the autobuild reports not in the digest so that they are more apparent. That sounds like a good solution. I have to say that I am very surprised that the

Re: [PD-dev] Fwd: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 21, Issue 29

2006-11-28 Thread Tim Blechmann
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:42 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: My the same measure, I find it difficult to track changes when the CVS checkins from the forks are also included. But I am not suggesting they be removed from the list because I am willing to tolerate that if it means