wow, great interface there.. is there any certain theory behind that
interface? how did you get the idea?
--
mataharipertama.wordpress.com
kotakmakan.multiply.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.pureda
Can anyone recommend a great laptop that can handle a full 2 hour PD/GEM
show? I have 50-100 gemhead events in my current show that get triggered
sequentially - i've been using a Gateway desktop computer with an AMD Phenom
8450 Triple Core 2.1 GHz processor running Vista 64 (yuck) with an nVidia
G
Nice interface, the graphics look quite unGem like, or at least what
I am used to seeing from Gem. It's good to see it branch out.
.hc
On Aug 8, 2008, at 6:12 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> hi,
> I put up a video of a project I did with Pd/GEM
> http://www.vimeo.com/1493233
> Everything is pr
On Mac OS X, you can use the Apple developer tool called Shark to get
pretty detailed profiling information. But it will refer to the
names of C functions, so you'll have to know what those mean for it
to be of much use.
.hc
On Aug 16, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Mike McGonagle wrote:
What platf
My guess is that it is caused by a some incompatibility of the
version of Tcl/Tk you are using. For example, Pd doesn't really work
fully with 8.5.x yet
.hc
On Aug 18, 2008, at 12:28 PM, michael noble wrote:
back again,
Thanks all for the input last night.
I only quickly had a look at
Check out this forum post
http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1471-midi-clock-sync
Mike
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
> Hi Dear List and Listers..
>
> for the first time i do more with MIDI
>
> i checked some posts in the archive, but they are quite old...
>
> The Problem: I would like to sync PD t
Joseph Barrows wrote:
> hi all,
> I would like some advice, i wish to track objects using a video camera
> and pd/gem (easy enough) but I would then like to project video into
> that same space, but avoid it interfering with the video object
> processing. is there some simple way to do: (live vide
Thanks a lot. That makes it clear.
I just assumed the channel variables were optional.
Thanks again (and IOhannes too).
Peter
On 19 Aug 2008, at 18:48, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Peter O'Doherty hat gesagt: // Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Will this do?
Yes, thanks.
There is a big differenc
Hallo,
Peter O'Doherty hat gesagt: // Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Will this do?
Yes, thanks.
There is a big difference between both versions: [readsf~] only plays
the first channel of a stereo file, while [readsf~ 2] plays both. See
attachement.
Ciao
--
Frank
#N canvas 0 1 860 525 10;
#X obj 506
Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will this do?
yes.
it depends on what you want.
when playing back a stereo-file with [readsf~] (NOT [readsf~ 2]), you
will only get the first channel.
if you want to hear both channels, you will have to add them manually.
fgmadsr
IOhannes
_
Hi,
Will this do?
#N canvas 0 0 1257 717 10;
#X obj -200 122 readsf~;
#X obj -97 302 dac~;
#X obj -55 135 readsf~;
#X msg -30 99 1;
#X msg 5 100 0;
#X text -203 22 Player1;
#X text -56 56 Player2;
#X msg -54 74 open .wav;
#X msg -176 455 1;
#X msg -142 455 0;
#X obj -91 684 dac~;
#X msg -24 481
Hallo,
Peter O'Doherty hat gesagt: // Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Assuming both soundfiles are stereo, which of these constructions is
> best for mixing x number of files together? They seem to be produce
> the same result, at least to my ears...
Hm, I cannot decipher the ascii art, it arrived h
Assuming both soundfiles are stereo, which of these constructions is
best for mixing x number of files together? They seem to be produce
the same result, at least to my ears...
(Each [*~ 0] is controlled by a slider.)
[ readsf~ 2 ] [ readsf~ 2 ]
| | | |
[*~ 0]
hi all,
I would like some advice, i wish to track objects using a video camera
and pd/gem (easy enough) but I would then like to project video into
that same space, but avoid it interfering with the video object
processing. is there some simple way to do: (live video) - (gem
generated video) = vid
14 matches
Mail list logo
