Well, this isn't completely true... You could use a Comment object
on top of the canvas, instead of having just the canvas... it does
sound like you are using static text, so you won't need to change the
label for the canvas, right?
Mike
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Laurent WILLKOMM
hi steve, welcome!
frank forgot to mention his excellent spectral delay.
http://footils.org/cms/weblog/2007/feb/20/beginners-guide-fft-objects-pd/
also search for the following for a bit of fun:
netpd , rjlib , diy2
just google pure data plus those words and yoU'll find them all.
heaps more
Hello,
sorry, this announce is only in French, here is a brief summary:
codelan.fr organizes the second Apréo Codelab on Saturday 25 April in
Quimper (French Far-West). Anyone interested in experimental practices
in the digital creation field is welcome. It's a meeting to meet in real
life, share
For really good comprehensive documentation also there's:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/puredata
and
http://www.pd-tutorial.com/ - which has useful sequencing tips
cheers
On 23 Apr 2009, at 08:41, hard off wrote:
hi steve, welcome!
frank forgot to mention his excellent spectral delay.
Jack schrieb:
Maybe with this objects : [until], [spigot], [select] or [==].
Or you can use [msgfile] with the message [goto(.
++
Jack
Le 22 avr. 09 à 13:21, potax flan a écrit :
did something like that as abstractions, see attached files.
readlines reads all lines of a file + amount of
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:33 -0300, Tuti wrote:
Hi,
that scheme will work only to turn on the newly created (and muted)
abstractions.
hm.. i thought, that is what you want
however, still there will be a click and/or audio
interruption as you do the pd dsp 0; pd dsp 1; trick. I seek a
just a sidenote, but you do know about [switch~] to turn off audio
processing in a subpatch/abstraction, right?
i used to have a patch that had about 3000 dsp building blocks (oscillators,
filters, waveshapers, eq, effects, etc), and the patch just switched on each
part when it was called. in