In terms of recording the Geos here's a sample patch of how I might do
that. Idea, method, and code stolen liberally from Marius Schebella's
posts to this list.
In terms of framerate, I am not sure but I would have guessed that you
could either send [auto 0( to [pix_record] then bang
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 08:56 -0500, John Harrison wrote:
In terms of recording the Geos here's a sample patch of how I might do
that. Idea, method, and code stolen liberally from Marius Schebella's
posts to this list.
In terms of framerate, I am not sure but I would have guessed that you
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
i am not totally sure, if this still applies, but iirc, [pix_record] has
a hardcoded framerate of 20fps.
This was never the case with pix_record on OSX and Windows. The pix_record
object on those platforms records
Hello,
For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-BLOB.
Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-BLOBs.
Is there any possibility to send BLOBs?
ciao
Wolfgang
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hello,
What's the best way to convert a signal into a message?
There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not
accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and
reconvert to a signal (with sig~, line~ or vline~) is clearly audible.
ciao
Wolfgang
Hello,
I'm having some troubles using the packOSC object. Especially sending
types True, False, Infinitum and Nil.
It's not possible to send those types alone in one message, e.g.:
sendtyped /address/1 TF
fails as well as:
sendtyped /address/1 iTF 23.
Only if those types occure within or before
chris clepper a écrit :
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
mailto:reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
i am not totally sure, if this still applies, but iirc, [pix_record] has
a hardcoded framerate of 20fps.
This was never the case with pix_record on OSX
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger wrote:
Hello,
What's the best way to convert a signal into a message?
There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not
accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and
reconvert to a signal (with
well, the question is for what reason are you doing it?
I think it is better to get some features from say sigmund~ and use
those to control or recreate, but i don't know what you want
J
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29
OK, thanks for the bug report. It should be fixed now in svn.
Martin
Wolfgang Jäger wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some troubles using the packOSC object. Especially sending
types True, False, Infinitum and Nil.
It's not possible to send those types alone in one message, e.g.:
sendtyped /address/1
Wolfgang Jäger wrote:
Hello,
For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-BLOB.
Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-BLOBs.
Is there any possibility to send BLOBs?
ciao
I can probably add a Blob type to [packOSC] and [unpackOSC]. The thing
is that the blob type is
--- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message
To: Wolfgang Jäger wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 5:54 PM
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 13:28 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
--- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message
To: Wolfgang Jäger wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Sunday, May 10,
Isn't it the last sample of the _last_ block?
I heard that somewhere.
So if you're processing block N on the current DSP tick
what you see is the [snapshot~] of N-1
???
On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
Isn't it the last sample of the
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
an easier way is to use [pack~] and [unpack~] from zexy. those convert a
signal vector (one block of audio samples) to a list of floats and vice
versa. if you want to have a stream of floats instead of lists, use
[drip].
Or use
Dear friends... i make a tracking controller for video, but in the Gem
window always appear the red circle with the cross... i want view and
control other videos with tracking... but always de red
circle...depth???gemhead -1??? gemwin-1??? i can measure the movement.
I use Mac Intel.
Thanks a lot
Jaime Oliver wrote:
well, the question is for what reason are you doing it?
I want to send audio data packed in OSC messages/bundles over Ethernet.
I think it is better to get some features from say sigmund~ and use
those to control or recreate, but i don't know what you want
I guess in
--- On Sun, 5/10/09, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote:
From: Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at, reduzie...@yahoo.de, pd-list@iem.at
Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 9:57 PM
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
an easier way is to use [pack~] and [unpack~] from zexy. those convert a
signal vector (one block of audio samples) to a list of floats and vice
versa. if you want to have a stream of floats instead of lists,
Hi,
since the release of F9 I look at the audio part of Linux - I
personally find it a complete disaster and 'user-hostile' to be
polite. Many on this list are software specialists, so please don't
look down on someone who doesn't want to follow 3 pages of
instructions of how to make
I have used fc8 and 10 with no problems, fc9 gave me a lot of problems..
J
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Lao Yu noise@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
since the release of F9 I look at the audio part of Linux - I personally
find it a complete disaster and 'user-hostile' to be polite. Many on this
21 matches
Mail list logo
