Hello Can anybody tell me if there is a command in pure opengl that performs
the same as gemlist_info?
Im trying to convert pd/gem patches into c++ and opengl and would like to know
how can i make the same as gemlist_info in pure opengl
thanks
A.
hello,
in pure open_gl, you can have only gemlist_matrix output.
then, you have to performe lot's of matrix computation in order to have the
same information than gemlist_info...
see sources file in order to have the exact opengl command + matrix operation
perform by this object.
c
punchik
Hello,
next tuesday, 18th May, will be the next meeting of Pure Data users in
Berlin at NK (http://www.nkprojekt.de/) - Elsenstr. 52, 2HH 2Etage.
For more information, look up
http://puredata.info/community/organization/pd-berlin/pd-berlin-users-group.
We also encourage you to take an active
hi ingo
what i found out now is mentioned in the issue in the bugtracker
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2978457group_id=55736atid=478070
no workaround in the moment.
its a pity, cause a project of mine is really waiting to go on air
us both, all the best for millers fixing
- Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca a écrit :
be available in a stable Pd-extended. I mean that development of
GridFlow
is going a bit fast at this point, and tends to be driven by requests
of
users that wouldn't want to wait until next year... more like next
month
or next
patko wrote:
- Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca a écrit :
be available in a stable Pd-extended. I mean that development of
GridFlow
is going a bit fast at this point, and tends to be driven by requests
of
users that wouldn't want to wait until next year... more like next
month
or
On Sun, 16 May 2010, patko wrote:
be available in a stable Pd-extended.
I don't understand this argument, there is almost everyday a new
pd-extended, that comes up from autobuilds why gridflow changes wouldn't
appear on new releases, since the source are taken from svn?
Those releases
On May 15, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Max wrote:
Am 15.05.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Max wrote:
it would be awesome if gridflow would be in pd-extended.
why ?
or: why not?
well, GEM and others are included as well, why isn't gridflow?
it would reduce the
Looks like not too many people seem to care too much about this. This bug
has been around for quite a while. I suppose it's breaking all of the
reverbs as well since they are working with stacked delays.
I'm wondering if there is anything around to replace [delwrite~] and
[delread~] that's
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:13 +0200, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Looks like not too many people seem to care too much about this.
Let me just say, that I do care as well. Also I couldn't find any
workable workaround for this problem. There is something wrong with
initialization in -nogui mode it
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:25 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:13 +0200, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Looks like not too many people seem to care too much about this.
Let me just say, that I do care as well. Also I couldn't find any
workable workaround for this problem. There
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:25 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:13 +0200, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Looks like not too many people seem to care too much about this.
Let me just say, that I do care as well. Also I couldn't find any
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:25 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:13 +0200, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Looks like not too many people seem to care too much about this.
Let me just say, that I
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 13:02 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
a workaround is to load the patch using
[loadbang]
|
[delay]
|
«open my-patch.pd .»
|
[s pd]
Ah, it was you posting to the bug-tracker ;-)
Many thanks for providing this work-around.
Roman
Thanks to all of you and thank you mathieu for the workaround
yous sincerely
der.brandt
Zitat von Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 18:25 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun,
On Sun, 16 May 2010, bra...@subnet.at wrote:
Thanks to all of you and thank you mathieu for the workaround
you actually don't need this workaround, because here's the fix :
--- d_delay.c (révision 13558)
+++ d_delay.c (copie de travail)
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
{
t_object x_obj;
16 matches
Mail list logo
